Half Alive Reviews

I don't think it's fair to bash on or criticise small game developers. Feedback sure, but it's not like this game is pretending to be something it's not, does it take inspiration from other games? Sure, what game doesn't? Honestly, this game is worth the price. It's simple, has a few bugs and also needs some work, what doesn't? I'd still pay the full $7.50 considering the developer is still working on the kinks, as opposed to $110 on a game from a big game developing company who knows their game is a big pile of garbage but don't suffer anywhere near as much as small game developers do *cough, cough, Dragon-Age, cough, cough, looking at you*. These bad reviews actually do a lot of harm, I think people should take it at face value more than they make an excuse to bag on. Overall: Game-play - 6/10 (had a lot of fun, minus the bugs) Aesthetics - 9/10 (It's low-poly wave, and I've seen a lot of them, this ones really good) Story-line - N/A (not really any story line but love the boss fights) Game-mechanics - 5/10 (as I've stated needs a lot of work, other than that, point and shoot) Concepts - 6/10 (similar concepts to a lot of other games, do love the challenges per set rounds) Note: I understand the flaws with the enemies (unable to get out of spawn so you have to search for them or forcefully leave the game due to game progression) and many other aspects can be quite frustrating, however $7.50? its bound to happen.