United Assault - World War 2 Reviews
PACIFIC - EASTERN FRONT - NORTH AFRICA - WESTERN FRONT | Fight on land, sea and air in an open world rogue lite FPS set in authentic theatres of of World War 2.
App ID | 1872870 |
App Type | GAME |
Developers | Polygon Art |
Publishers | Polygon Art Publishing |
Categories | Single-player, Steam Achievements, Partial Controller Support |
Genres | Indie, Action, Early Access |
Release Date | 30 Mar, 2023 |
Platforms | Windows |
Supported Languages | English |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d647/4d64794624ffac7be72c01cf2729b01d8204ac4a" alt="United Assault - World War 2"
4 Total Reviews
2 Positive Reviews
2 Negative Reviews
Mixed Score
United Assault - World War 2 has garnered a total of 4 reviews, with 2 positive reviews and 2 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Mixed’ overall score.
Reviews Chart
Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for United Assault - World War 2 over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.
Recent Steam Reviews
This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback
Playtime:
36 minutes
Holy shit what a broken, unfinished mess.
It definitely has potential, however, it's so janky and the physics are so wild that I couldn't help but laugh when:
a) my plane collided in to some palm trees and just stuttered in there, until I got out
b) the PT boat almost launched itself out of the water when I was walking along trying to use the mounted guns (I couldn't)
The gunplay is actually pretty slick, but the game is let down by the animations, physics and optimisation
My Graohics card (2080 Super) was really chugging along without either DLSS or RT on
I bought this because it was on sale and the concept sounded intriguing. It's not worth it though. Even for <$5
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Negative