Store
NIMBY Rails Reviews
Design and run your own railroads for the real world. Solve global transportation dilemmas. Unleash your inner railway engineer and transit policy manager.
| App ID | 1134710 |
| App Type | GAME |
| Developers | Weird and Wry |
| Publishers | Weird and Wry |
| Categories | Single-player, Steam Cloud, Multi-player, Co-op, Online Co-op, Steam Workshop |
| Genres | Simulation, Early Access |
| Release Date | 26 Jan, 2021 |
| Platforms | Windows |
| Supported Languages | English |
1 059 Total Reviews
943 Positive Reviews
116 Negative Reviews
Very Positive Score
NIMBY Rails has garnered a total of 1 059 reviews, with 943 positive reviews and 116 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Very Positive’ overall score.
Reviews Chart
Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for NIMBY Rails over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.
Recent Steam Reviews
This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback
Playtime:
18117 minutes
trains go we wo
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
17463 minutes
Honestly just fun
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
9915 minutes
great fun
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
1406 minutes
yes
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
6135 minutes
The only game of its class in scale and complexity
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
2083 minutes
I'm editing this review since I've sunk a lot of time into the game at this point.
I haven't felt "addicted" to a game like this in over a decade. The concept is tons of fun, and it's beyond satisfying recreating and even improving real-life train lines.
However, a major issue with this game's playability is its lack of documentation. Seriously, the interface and menus are extensive to a fault. Some poor decision making was at play releasing this product before documentation with it (the links on the associated "wiki" are half-baked at best, or take you to pages that don't exist at worst). It has its (pretty hair-pulling) moments because of this.
It took me eons to figure out how everything worked by trial-and-error, and if this weren't the case, I wouldn't be leaving a negative review. I probably would leave a positive one otherwise as there's nothing else quite like it.
👍 : 2 |
😃 : 1
Negative
