EMPORIUM 评测

亲娘呀，我以为这不是恐怖游戏的，怎么给我突然来个关灯杀。心脏都快跳出来了好吗。

基本上在开头就能猜到剧情的大致走向，但不得不说这游戏还是挺意识流的，虽然过一遍流程很短，但没的存档还是有点蛋疼

刷完美达成游戏数可以买，体验剧情不建议买，体验一下抑郁的感觉可以买，总之我再也不说其他游戏流程短了，短也没这个短。另外这游戏标签太名不副实了，这六个标签我在游戏里只体验到第一个。不过人已经在商店界面‘关于这款游戏’里说了这是个small game lasting roughly 30-45 mins我再说短并给出不推荐是不是有点碰瓷的感觉。bgm不错，当初买的时候看画面我还以为是inside那种呢，下下来都做好被惊艳的准备了结果惊字还没有一撇呢游戏全成就达成了

看得出来是想追求意义深刻的，但玩下来不知所云，气氛营造的很好，风格好音乐也好就是很pretentious。

当成游戏来玩的话，这游戏会令你失望。56分钟的流程时长，八个主场景，五个Steam成就，14次双选对答，……内容不多。 在我看来，按题材来看，本作应该可以说是……自杀念头模拟器？ 不对，更像是一场展现、一场表演——而不是模拟体验。 整个过程从头到尾我根本完全彻底没法投入——或者说，融入——进到主角“推销员”的处境去感受他的感受。 毋宁说，EMPORIUM压根就不是打算让玩家体验“自杀”的处境。 indienova的文章《[url=https://www.indienova.com/indie-game-review/emporium/]一场自我表演华丽死亡的舞台剧[/url]》已经将关于本作的方方面面讲得很具体、很全面了。就不用我在这多费口舌啦。

游戏需要一点点英语。因为没有中文评论，所以自告奋勇当了第一人。 感觉上游戏应该还可以，INSIDE那一类。 游戏有不太多的英文对话，仅靠画面估计也可以理解的八九不离十。为游戏的风格打个推荐。完成游戏后会追评。 -------------------------------------------- 这一鸽就是七年 游戏给我的感觉永远是过而不及，接下来是有争议的话了 "游戏算不上艺术，最多是精致的娱乐产品" 游戏通过精妙的设计变成一场“命定的努力” 在游戏里你知道你努力一定会成功，制作者的巧妙数值设定就是为了这个唯一目标而设定，这个努力在游戏结束后就不再有意义，它不是任何可以转移的经验，不是任何通用的技巧，甚至算不上有感情的记忆，它也无法与任何人共享，只能存在在你的脑海里，它甚至无法有任何“然后”，它必须也只能是一个结束 我承认巫师3本体结束后的那个瞬间(最坏结局)确实给了我巨大的冲击；RD2的一切确实值得回忆，游戏必须要以死亡为结局，因为死亡才是唯一的终结，才是真正"命定的" 然而为了游戏性，游戏终究有无意义的设计或者说"浪费的组件" 一个不具备“无意义的组件”的游戏不会是商业成功的，艺术的唯一特性在且仅在于以下这一点"它不能加减任何一点" 这也是所有商业产品的宿命，为了商业化，或者商业价值，它必须具有无意义的组件。 “最伟大的事物永远是在个人独处时产生的” 是的 我不会完成这个游戏 时间是宝贵的，死亡永远跟在我们后面，人生没有太多小时，看着那死亡的阴影，离开游戏吧，永远的，这不值得 所有这些，都不值得 不值得 (The game requires a little bit of English. Since there is no Chinese review, I volunteered to be the first one. It feels like the game should be okay, INSIDE that category. The game has not too much English dialog, just rely on the screen estimate can also be understood about eight or nine. I'd like to make a recommendation for the style of the game. Will follow up with a review after I finish the game. -------------------------------------------- It's been seven years. The game never feels like it's too much for me, so here's the next controversial quote "Games aren't art, they're sophisticated entertainment at best." Games become a "destined endeavor" through subtle design. In a game you know you're going to succeed if you try, the makers' clever numerical settings are set for that sole purpose, and that effort ceases to have any meaning at the end of the game, it's not any transferable experience, it's not any generalized skill, it's not even a sentimental memory, it's not something you can share with anyone, it only exists in your mind, it doesn't even have any "and then", it doesn't even have any "and then", it doesn't even have any "and then". "and then", it must and can only be an end I'll admit that the moment after the end of THE Witcher 3 itself (the worst possible ending) really hit me hard; everything about Red Dead Redemption 2 was really memorable, and the game had to end with a death, because death is the only end, it's the only thing that's really "meant to be". However, for the sake of gameplay, the game has meaningless design or "wasted components". A game that doesn't have "meaningless components" will not be a commercial success, the only characteristic of art is that it can't add or subtract anything. This is the fate of all commercial products, in order to be commercially viable, it must have meaningless components. "The greatest things are always created when individuals are alone." Yeah, I'm not gonna finish the game. Time is precious, death will always follow us, life doesn't have too many hours, look at that shadow of death, get out of the game, forever, it's not worth it ALL OF THIS ,THERE ARE NOT WORTH IT NOT!!!)