I was here
Charts
9 😀     14 😒
43,31%

Rating

Compare I was here with other games
$0.99

I was here Reviews

Test your ingenuity and explore the world from your sofa with our trivia game "I Was Here", where the objective is to guess the place from the photos.
App ID707960
App TypeGAME
Developers
Publishers Okinawa Sunrise
Categories Single-player, Steam Achievements
Genres Casual, Indie, Adventure
Release Date5 Oct, 2017
Platforms Windows, Mac, Linux
Supported Languages English

I was here
23 Total Reviews
9 Positive Reviews
14 Negative Reviews
Mixed Score

I was here has garnered a total of 23 reviews, with 9 positive reviews and 14 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Mixed’ overall score.

Reviews Chart


Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for I was here over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.


Recent Steam Reviews

This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback

Playtime: 267 minutes
[quote][b][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_flip]Warning: Asset Flip![/url][/b] "I was here" is a Digital Homicide style asset flip, or what Valve calls a "Fake Game". The "developer" paid for/pirated a few online game assets and stock images, dumped them all in a blender, and submitted it to Valve as if they're real game developers.[/quote] It's a crappy quiz game where you look at one of the photos the developer stole off the internet and guess what country it is. It would be more fun trying to guess which image hosting site the developer stole it from. You get two choices for which sets of photos you want to look at. Europe, or, guess which country... yeah, Russia. Two notable criteria for what makes an asset flip instead of legitimate use of stock assets are whether those assets comprise the majority of the game, and whether the "developer" properly credited the people who created most of the assets in the game. This game fails both of those tests. The "developers" here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets here, so this is plagiarism, as well as cash grab shovelware. In this case, the asset flipper stole a bunch of stock landscape photos from the internet and is trying to get YOUR money for someone else's intellectual property by shoving those stolen pictures into a very basic quiz game template... that the developer ripped off from a Unity tutorial/template/demo pack. It has no value or merit as a real game. Taking this shovelware seriously as if it was a genuine attempt to make a game, it doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks. There's no way to ensure this is running at the native resolution of your display. There's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. The controls can't be customised because the game has such a dumbed down, simplified interface that it's just point and click stuff like a browser/Flash game. The fact that the interface is this dumbed down might be seen as a problem in itself, however... this is a fairly shallow experience if you're the kind of gamer that likes to play games with deep, rich control schemes and interaction. You'll get none of that here. For gameplay purposes, because the user interface for this game is mostly just 2D static text/images... it might as well be a web page. It's functionally no different from a browser game. And we all know, Steam isn't here to compete with Chrome and Firefox. If the game can be done in a web browser, it's just not rich or compelling enough to appeal to serious gamers on PC. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. The poor quality of this game is reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the all-time peak player number was only 5 players. This is a remarkably low number, and now, the only player activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 120 million gamers on Steam and well over 110,000 games for gamers to choose from, the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality game is to be expected. This kind of asset flipping isn't harmless. It makes it harder for gamers to find genuinely made games from ethical developers. It makes it harder for genuine indie developers, who put hard work into trying to make real games, to find an audience for their products. It gives indie developers a bad name. So, should you buy this asset flip? Is this better than any of the 110,000+ genuinely made games on Steam? Of course not! "I was here" has the gamer gouging price of around $6 USD, it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the sheer number of completely free, much higher quality games on Steam. For comparison, the $6 asking price for this game could get you games like "Dishonored 2", "Pillars of Eternity II" or "Grand Theft Auto V". Quality, professionally made games like those are frequently on sale cheaper than this.
👍 : 1 | 😃 : 0
Negative
File uploading