iterform
1 😀     5 😒
35,22%

Rating

Compare iterform with other games
$0.99

iterform Reviews

iterform is a minimalistic hardcore platformer with experimental respawn mechanic and ability to create replicas and respawn on them.
App ID873210
App TypeGAME
Developers
Publishers Not a Prototype games
Categories Single-player, Steam Achievements, Full controller support, Stats
Genres Indie, Action
Release Date12 Jun, 2018
Platforms Windows, Linux
Supported Languages English

iterform
6 Total Reviews
1 Positive Reviews
5 Negative Reviews
Mostly Negative Score

iterform has garnered a total of 6 reviews, with 1 positive reviews and 5 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Mostly Negative’ overall score.

Reviews Chart


Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for iterform over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.


Recent Steam Reviews

This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback

Playtime: 12 minutes
It's bad.
👍 : 21 | 😃 : 0
Negative
Playtime: 19 minutes
Really bad and lame don't get this
👍 : 0 | 😃 : 0
Negative
Playtime: 311 minutes
It's the biggest piece of dog shit that I've ever heard
👍 : 0 | 😃 : 1
Negative
Playtime: 9 minutes
this game is so fun 12/12 would pruchase if you are rich
👍 : 0 | 😃 : 1
Positive
Playtime: 116 minutes
iterform is yet another of literally thousands of 2D retro pixel platformers infesting Steam and lowering the average quality of all video games everywhere. This one is extremely minimalist and features the gimmick where you can clone yourself (which teleports you back to the start but leaves a "copy" of yourself that you can use as a platform or block for some of the grey boxes that move around as a hazard. Which is I guess maybe slightly more depth than your average endless runner, and at that point you should see we're comparing a poke in the eye to a kick in the shin here as far as "quality gaming" is concerned. From a technical perspective, the game doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. The graphics here are some of the worst, laziest attempt at video game "art" I've ever seen. It's hard to suggest this game even has graphics. It's just untextured, basic pixel blocks and blobs, the kind that an infant child might be able to create in 5 minutes on MS Paint. It's clear the developer didn't even try to produce any real graphics for the game and just phoned it in. It's unclear why such a lazy approach was taken, whether it may be caused by lack of talent, budget, or motivation to do their job properly. It also doesn't matter... what matters is that this has resulted in a game with zero visual appeal for gamers. It's an immediate failure on that measure alone. There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customise the graphics settings. There's no way for gamers to ensure this is running at the native resolution of their displays... there's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. There's no way for gamers to try improve the low quality graphics. The controls can't be customised, which will be an annoyance for many, but it can also render the game unplayable for differently-abled gamers. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. The poor quality of this game is reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the all-time peak player number was only 4 players. This is a remarkably low number, and now, the only player activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 120 million gamers on Steam and well over 50,000 games for gamers to choose from (over 9,000 completely free titles), the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality game is to be expected. iterform is relatively cheap at $3 USD, but it's not worth it. Given the defects and quality issues with the game, coupled with the unrealistic price, this is impossible to recommend.
👍 : 5 | 😃 : 1
Negative
Playtime: 35 minutes
i got a coupon for this and it is still not worth it. free games on the app store are better than this and this costs money
👍 : 5 | 😃 : 1
Negative
File uploading