What Would You Do? Reviews
This game is a decision based simulation placing you in the shoes of somebody in a crisis situation. Unlike some games, your decisions have a serious impact on the story and the events that follow. It is meant to resemble real time meaning that a no decision counts as an action, and can result in lost time or negative consequences.
App ID | 525530 |
App Type | GAME |
Developers | Matthew Roach |
Publishers | Matthew Roach |
Categories | Single-player |
Genres | Indie, Simulation |
Release Date | 2 Oct, 2016 |
Platforms | Windows |
Supported Languages | English |

14 Total Reviews
7 Positive Reviews
7 Negative Reviews
Mixed Score
What Would You Do? has garnered a total of 14 reviews, with 7 positive reviews and 7 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Mixed’ overall score.
Reviews Chart
Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for What Would You Do? over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.
Recent Steam Reviews
This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback
Playtime:
10 minutes
All i feel is regret
👍 : 7 |
😃 : 7
Negative
Playtime:
6 minutes
A 5 min game. Not worth the time, or paying for.
👍 : 35 |
😃 : 2
Negative
Playtime:
16 minutes
Never in my life have I ever played this bad. I hate everything now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOJQfh5c2kA
👍 : 11 |
😃 : 9
Negative
Playtime:
8 minutes
After having asked my subscribers what they thought of the game, I would recommend the game. Yes, the game is short, the music and visuals are not the best. But, the idea and conceptualisation of the game is good. I like the decision based aspect of the game. What I don't enjoy as much is the excution.
My viewers felt that it was weird and different. They felt that some of the situations would not occur in a real life situation as depicted but gave credit to the games set up and concept as well.
If you would like to see my first reaction and gameplay of the game I have posted it on my channel here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIcqpF_vNeM
👍 : 1 |
😃 : 1
Positive
Playtime:
21 minutes
i thought it would be good but the trailer and game play are very different. all you do is when it says decision time you press on of two options and the graphics are good. it a cool game and all i just think i could be better and it is very short i got all endings in 21 minutes. i would give it a 10/10 in ideas 3/10 in game play a 2/10 in graphics and you cant move improve these things and this could be better than fnaf. but either than that good game over all its a 5/10
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
9 minutes
Rotfl what a stupid game. I finished the game with each scenario in 30 seconds.. The fact you're even charging people for this trash is laughable.. Well done for ripping people off even if it is only a couple of quid.,
👍 : 6 |
😃 : 0
Negative
Playtime:
9079 minutes
A (very) small choose your own adventure type of game about "What would you do" if there was a home invader situation.
After a few play-throughs (which only take a minute or so) you've seen as there is to see.
Recommended if on sale & you like weird indie games.
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
Playtime:
8 minutes
2 $ wasted. This game is really awfull. Walkthroughs last literally less than 2 minutes, animations are garbage. Not even the pictures that pretend to be the locations are well shot, the high grain of the pictures due to the low ambient light when they were taken is witness.
Presumptuous and with literally no depth at all. Not recommended.
👍 : 52 |
😃 : 4
Negative
Playtime:
14 minutes
the game is just for someone to make a quick buck, waste of money. the graphics are litterly pictures edited with fucking paint. the entire game is based around decisions although in the one minute you play this game you only get 2-3 decisions to make. its basically a kill yourself simulator.
👍 : 31 |
😃 : 7
Negative
Playtime:
46 minutes
"Aw, son-of-a-bitch got me." (Actual in-game quote, after protagonist is stabbed with a knife and pushed out a second-storey window.)
The Eternal Fuckwit, also known as rjmacready, once again throws perfectly good money in a toilet, pisses on it, then flushes it away. All in the name of honest journalism, he tells himself. The public needs to be informed, he tells himself.
Fucking wannabe martyrs...
In all fairness, this is an interesting premise. Done with an appalling lack of effort, and an equal lack of talent. The dev should, in future, consider selling his perfectly good ideas to others, or at the very least NOT ASK MONEY to get "feedback" on his hastily whipped-up tech demos.
Oh, and for anyone tempted to write "this seems more like a Flash game than something which should be on Steam"...the game opens in something called Macromedia Flash Player 7, so there's really no need for you to surmise. It IS a Flash game, and graciously makes no bones about it. Case solved.
Basically it's an interactive novel, lasting barely three minutes, with a tiny bit of motion added to its jaw-droppingly ugly graphics. The uber-primitive, buzzing synth score is kinda charming, though.
Verdict: 2/10 (1 point for the premise, 1 point for the soundtrack).
(PS I can only assume I got the "good ending" when I chose to ignore my wife's pleas to wake up, found my family being stabbed to death once I did manage to drag my ass out of bed, then decided to flee the scene with the word "COWARD" badgering me on-screen. That IS the good ending, right?)
👍 : 38 |
😃 : 16
Negative