Store
Virtual Families Reviews
From the developer of the smash-hit Virtual Villagers series comes the new casual game that captures the drama of life—Virtual Families! Virtual Families is a casual family sim that runs in true-real time. Adopt and nurture a needy person in the computer. Help them meet a mate, and start a family.
| App ID | 16200 |
| App Type | GAME |
| Developers | Last Day Of Work |
| Publishers | Last Day Of Work |
| Categories | Single-player |
| Genres | Casual, Simulation |
| Release Date | 6 May, 2009 |
| Platforms | Windows |
| Supported Languages | English |
67 Total Reviews
58 Positive Reviews
9 Negative Reviews
Mostly Positive Score
Virtual Families has garnered a total of 67 reviews, with 58 positive reviews and 9 negative reviews, resulting in a ‘Mostly Positive’ overall score.
Reviews Chart
Chart above illustrates the trend of feedback for Virtual Families over time, showcasing the dynamic changes in player opinions as new updates and features have been introduced. This visual representation helps to understand the game's reception and how it has evolved.
Recent Steam Reviews
This section displays the 10 most recent Steam reviews for the game, showcasing a mix of player experiences and sentiments. Each review summary includes the total playtime along with the number of thumbs-up and thumbs-down reactions, clearly indicating the community's feedback
Playtime:
206 minutes
[b] *Mixed Review [/b]
I used to play this game at my friend's house on her computer every chance I got. This game is nostalgic as hell, especially since I played it on her family's HP Windows 7 computer on WildTangent Games. Despite being a pay-to-play platform, before Steam, in the late 2000s, WildTangent Games held it down for me. Now that I think of it, I think we stopped playing because we ran out of coins, lmao (this game's also what let us to play house too, lmao). All in all, before Sims and all those social virtual world games, I played Virtual Families. I didn't even know it had sequels, so I might try 2 and 3 since the first game was fun, but didn't really age well.
👍 : 0 |
😃 : 0
Positive
